My New Adventure into the World of Data Science

Over the past year and a half, I've learning a variety of skills: freestyle rap, dance, pick-up/social dynamics, copywriting, improv, speed-reading/memory techniques, entrepreneurship, digital marketing, web development and poker. The goal was to "learn how to learn" aka meta-learning. And while learning a ton of random skills is pretty fun and makes me an interesting person, if I'm looking to get enough at something to turn it into a career, I need to focus on getting good at one skill.

And after a year and half of island hopping, I've decided to dive headfirst into a new adventure: data science. And i use the word "adventure" because seeing this as an "adventure" sounds much more appealing than just "pivoting careers."

And from now on, I'm no longer gonna write in the 'you' format. For a couple reasons:

1. I'm not in a position to tell you what to do with your life. I can only speak to my own experiences.

2. Sick of internet writers telling me '10 ways to be more successful' or '5 hacks to be more productive.' --> Charlatans. 

Hence, I write about what I learn in life, through more of an immersive journalism lens. If you can relate or get value from it, even better. 

I'm writing this post for a couple reasons:

1. To share my thought process on how I chose Data Science. My way is definitely not the "right" way. But it's different from the "find your passion" dogma floating around millenials. This works for me, maybe it'll work for you :) 

2. I'm all about clean, fluid thinking. And by getting my thoughts out onto the page, I can dissect my thought process and identify flaws in my thinking. 

Before I dive in, I want to introduce a concept called first principles thinking , which has had an ENORMOUS influence on how I think about thingsAs Elon Musk says:

“I think it is important to reason from first principles rather than by analogy. The normal way we conduct our lives is we reason by analogy. [When reasoning by analogy] we are doing this because it’s like something else that was done or it is like what other people are doing — slight iterations on a theme.

First principles is kind of a physics way of looking at the world. You boil things down to the most fundamental truths and say, “What are we sure is true?” … and then reason up from there.

Somebody could say, “Battery packs are really expensive and that’s just the way they will always be… Historically, it has cost $600 per kilowatt hour. It’s not going to be much better than that in the future.”

With first principles, you say, “What are the material constituents of the batteries? What is the stock market value of the material constituents?”

It’s got cobalt, nickel, aluminum, carbon, some polymers for separation and a seal can. Break that down on a material basis and say, “If we bought that on the London Metal Exchange what would each of those things cost?”

It’s like $80 per kilowatt hour. So clearly you just need to think of clever ways to take those materials and combine them into the shape of a battery cell and you can have batteries that are much, much cheaper than anyone realizes.”

In order to figure out which direction I wanted to go, I asked myself three, first principles questions:

1. What do I enjoy? When I was a kid, I was obsessed with sports. To this day, I still remember random, arbitrary facts from over a decade ago. I remember that Tom Brady( quarterback of the New England Patriots) went 9-7 in 2002 and missed the playoffs the year after he won his Super Bowl. I remember in 2006, the lone season Randy Moss played a full season on the Raiders, he had exactly 1005 receiving yards(without Googling the numbers). Obviously, those last two sentences won't make sense to those who don't watch football. But the idea is that numbers/stats came pretty easily to me. I don't know if it's my passion, but I enjoyed it, which leads me to the next question......

2. What am I good at? Ever since I've started blogging, a lot of people have told me that I'm pretty good at writing. Obviously, this judgment is relative. I would say I'm OK, relative to my peers. But the odd thing is, when I was a kid, I wasn't a good writer. I got a 520 on the SAT writing section. I've never gotten an A on a paper until I was in college. And I probably read around 1 or 2 books a year when I was a kid. 

But I was killer at math. I got an A in every single math class I've ever taken( except one Calculus class in college). Obviously, as I read and write more, I get better at it. But as Gary Vaynerchuk says:

" Go all-in on your strengths and outsource your weaknesses."

I don't think taking this advice to the extreme is helpful. But I do agree, that focusing on things that come a bit more naturally to me eases my climb towards mastery.  

3. What's going to be important in the future? Money is usually the sign that I'm doing something valuable for the world. There are exceptions, like getting rich off gambling, or daytrading, but I believe that when I add real value to the world, the world will reward me with more than enough $$$.

And if I do want to add value to the world, thinking about what's important in the future, can be the door to figuring out what skills I want to focus on. 

Obviously, when thinking about the future, there are A TON of "important" things. Too many to list in a blog post. Combining future importance with my interests, I wittled my list to these items:

- Virtual Reality

- Artificial Intelligence/Big Data

- Renewable Energy

- 3-D Printing

- Human DNA Sequencing

- Nano-technology

Using my answers from questions 1 and 2, out of all the options, transitioning to AI/Big-Data probably has the least amount of friction considering my current skillset/interests/strengths. 

Conclusion:  Data Science

Obviously, I don't know if this is "what I want to do." But I've come to the conclusion, in every stage of my life, I'll always be figuring out what's next. Like Ralph Waldo Emerson says: 

" The voyage of the best ship is a zigzag line of a hundred tacks. See the line from a sufficient distance, and it straightens itself to the average tendency. Your genuine action will explain itself, and will explain your other genuine actions. Your conformity explains nothing. Act singly, and what you have already done singly will justify you now." 

The journey never ends. There might be a point where I reach the end of my Data Science adventure. What will I do? I'll find a new adventure. 

 

 

 

 

 

Bruce Lee on How to Live

 

" Empty your mind. Be formless. Shapeless. Like water. You put water into a cup it becomes the cup; You put into a bottle it becomes the bottle; You put it in a teapot it becomes the teapot. Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water my friend. " - Bruce Lee  

Note: Excuse my second grade drawings

I always thought of Bruce Lee as some fierce, rock-hard ab, gung-fu artist. When I was obsessed with working out, I'd constantly google 'Bruce Lee' workouts and try to mimic them. However, I had no clue this dude wrote about philosophy, life and self-actualization.

Anyways, I picked up "The Warrior Within" by John Little and I was literally put to tears reading about his philosophy. 

I thought I'd share with you two things I learned from the book:

1. Self-Actualization

Copying Lee's philosophies would go against the very principles Lee stood by. As his son Brandon says:

"When I did The Green Hornet television series back in 1965, I looked around and I saw a lot of human beings. And as I looked at myself, I was the only robot there. I was not being myself. I was trying to accumulate external security, external technique- the way to move my arm and so on--- but 'such a thing had happened to me?' When I look around, I always learn to have faith in yourself. Do not go out and look for a successful personality and duplicate him. That seems to me to be the prevalent thing happening here in Hong Kong. They always copy a person's mannerisms, but they never see beyond that. They never start at the very source, the very root of their own being, and ask the question: 'How can I be me?'"

Lee defined the summit of human achievement, not in success or financial reward, but by the honest expressing of oneself:

"In life, what more can you ask for than to be real? To fulfill one's potential instead of wasting energy on [attempting to] actualize one's dissipating image, which is not real and an expenditure of one's vital energy. We have great work ahead of us, and it needs devotion and much, much energy. To grow, to discover, we need involvement, which is something I experience every day--- sometimes good, sometimes frustrating. No matter what, you must let your inner light guide you out of the darkness." 

Because when I'm not in touch with my honest feelings, how can I expect to truly enjoy the juices of life? How can I truly create something original? There is no such thing as copied originality. Because the next Bruce Lee will not be Bruce Lee. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be Mark Zuckerberg. The next Steve Jobs will not be Steve Jobs. 

But what does honest self-expression actually mean? I think it means to just know what you want from life, independent from the crowd. And that's really hard, because people, society, constantly hammer their un-grounded beliefs and ideas into your head. And if you're not careful, a nail might get lodged into your brain. 

But does this mean that I should discount advice from "successful" people and solely trust myself? I don't think it's that black and white. Lee outlines a four-step process he teaches in jeet kune do:

" 1) Research your own experience

2) Absorb what is useful

3) Reject what is useless

4) Add what is specifically your own "

Because the only way to develop an intuitive grasp of what works for me and what doesn't, can only come from experience.

2. Relationships

In addition to self-actualization, Lee beautifully articulates his beliefs on love:

" Love is like a friendship caught on fire. In the beginning, a flame, very pretty, often hot and fierce, but still only light and flickering. As love grows older, our hearts mature and our love becomes as coals, deep-burning and unquenchable."

Because long-term romance isn't the exciting, passion-filled romance of young, crazy adventures. It's that mundane, 6000th dinner, after a tired day of work:

"The happiness that is derived from excitement is like a brilliant fire--- soon it will go out. Before we married, we never had the chance to go out to nightclubs. We only spent our nights watching TV and chatting. Many young couples live a very exciting life when they are in love. So, when they marry, and their lives are related to calmness and dullness, they will feel impatient and will drink the bitter cup of a sad marriage" 

But Lee doesn't limit his definition of relationships to romance. The ultimate relationship is the one between life and death:

" Like everyone else, you want to learn the way to win, but never to accept the way to lose. To accept defeat-- to learn to die-- is to be liberated from it. Once you accept, you are free to flow and to harmonize. Fluidity is the way to an empty mind. So when tomorrow comes, you must free your ambitious mind and learn the art of dying." 

We learn to live by learning to die, while many of us are dying to live. We're in this constant searching for money, posessions, a lust, to allow us to start living. In reality, we don't need to ask the world for permission. We have permission. We just need to choose to use it. 

The Warrior Within by John Little is a beautiful book on the philosophies of Bruce Lee. Highly recommended.